What do you have to offer men and boys, though? Some of Reeves and Galloway's ideas are incredibly dangerous - such as red-shirting boys, which is basically societally enforcing the idea that boys are intellectually inferior to girls. The people criticizing them, however, are either traditionalists on the right or people who think that men and boys don't have problems and don't deserve help.
I think there’s a lot of people criticizing them that are honest about boys and men’s experiences that don’t rely on traditional forms of manhood. I wish to be expansive about the view of masculinity and I think that’s what’s going to help men more than the rigid idea that Reeves and Galloway believe men are
Check out the idea of multiple masculinities or expansive masculinity. The works of Joseph Gelfer and Raewyn Connell. That’s what I want. I do think men need to stop being defensive about the idea of the expansion of masculinities.
>What concrete actions do you think should be taken to help men and boys?
Or do you think that it's just a matter of men needing to not be defensive? The problem is entirely within men, it's not systemic, it's self-inflicted on individual men by individual men?
Go check out what I have written and spoken about and get back to me. I have no time for your bad faith assumptions. Or if you want to stay mad about it, you can do that too. Up to you.
The fact that you're avoiding answering the question tells me what I need to know. You aren't worried that Galloway will hurt men and boys, as I am; you're terrified he's going to help them.
What do you have to offer men and boys, though? Some of Reeves and Galloway's ideas are incredibly dangerous - such as red-shirting boys, which is basically societally enforcing the idea that boys are intellectually inferior to girls. The people criticizing them, however, are either traditionalists on the right or people who think that men and boys don't have problems and don't deserve help.
I think there’s a lot of people criticizing them that are honest about boys and men’s experiences that don’t rely on traditional forms of manhood. I wish to be expansive about the view of masculinity and I think that’s what’s going to help men more than the rigid idea that Reeves and Galloway believe men are
What concrete actions do you think should be taken to help men and boys? Or do you think they just need to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps?
Check out the idea of multiple masculinities or expansive masculinity. The works of Joseph Gelfer and Raewyn Connell. That’s what I want. I do think men need to stop being defensive about the idea of the expansion of masculinities.
>What concrete actions do you think should be taken to help men and boys?
Or do you think that it's just a matter of men needing to not be defensive? The problem is entirely within men, it's not systemic, it's self-inflicted on individual men by individual men?
Go check out what I have written and spoken about and get back to me. I have no time for your bad faith assumptions. Or if you want to stay mad about it, you can do that too. Up to you.
The fact that you're avoiding answering the question tells me what I need to know. You aren't worried that Galloway will hurt men and boys, as I am; you're terrified he's going to help them.